• ფორმულა 1: გრან პრი 2019

    2019 წლის ფორმულა ერთის გრან პრი სარბოლო სესიებით

  • ავტომობილის თვითდიაგნოსტიკის ფუნქცია

    თანამედროვე და, მით უმეტეს, მომავლის „ჭკვიანი ავტომობილის“ ტექნიკური სისტემის მართვა წარმოუდგენელია მისი შემადგენელი მექანიზმებისა და მოწყობილობების მუშაობის მუდმივი (თვით)დიაგნოსტიკის გარეშე. ეს აუცილებელია, რათა მართვის სისტემამ დროულად მოახდინოს რეაგირება სისტემაში მომხდარ არასტანდარტულ მოვლენებზე და ეცადოს, თავად აღმოფხვრას იგი; ან ოპერატიულად გააფრთხილოს მძღოლი უწესივრობების შესახებ; ან (უკიდურეს შემთხვევაში) დაიმახსოვროს ისინი, რათა მოთხოვნისთანავე მიაწოდოს მათ შესახებ ინფორმაცია სერვისის თანამშრომელს (ან მძღოლს).

  • Sir Vival - ექსპერიმენტალური უსაფრთხო ავტომობილი შორეული წარსულიდან

    არსებობენ ავტომობილები, რომლებიც ხანდახან დროს უსწრებენ: ტექნოლოგიით, ვიზუალით თუ ა.შ. უშუალოდ კი ეს ერთგვარი "მუშტაიდის საბავშვო მანქანა" სინამდვილეში 1958 წლის Sir Vival-ია. რომელიც ვოლტერ ჯერომის შთაგონებთი მისია იყო შეექმნა მსოფლიოში ყველაზე დაცული ავტომობილი. პროექტი 10 წელი გაგრძელდა. საბოლოო ჯამში, მას მართალია დასახული მიზანი ბოლომდე ვერ გამოუვიდა მაგრამ მისმა ქმნილებამ მსოფლოში ყველაზე უცნაური ავტომობილის ტიტული მაინც დაიმსახურა. რეალურად, იგი ერთ-ერთი პირველი ავტომობილია 1957 წლის Aurora-სთან ერთად რომელიც ექსპერიმენტალურ უსაფრთხო ავტომობილად შეიქმნა.

  • საავტომობილო შიგაწვის ძრავები

    საავტომობილო ტრანსპორტში დღეისთვის გამოყენებულია ნავთობური წარმოშობის თხევად საწვავზე (ან აირად საწვავზე) მომუშავე შიგაწვის ძრავები. აღნიშნული ენერგეტიკული დანადგარის დანიშნულებაა ნავთობური წარმოშობის საწვავის წვის შედეგად მიღებული ქიმიური ენერგია გარდაქმნას მექანიკურ ენერგიად.

  • რა არის Top fuel და რით განსხვავდება ბენზინისაგან

    თუკი გნებავთ შექმნათ მაღალი სიძლიერის მქონე 4 ტაქტიანი (Stroke) ძრავა, არსებობს რამოდენიმე მეთოდი მის მისაღწევად. პირველი: გავზარდოთ ტაქტი. მეორე: დავაყენოთ ტურბინა/სუპერჩარჯერი. მესამე და ბოლო: შევცვალოთ ბენზინი სხვა უფრო ენერგეტიკული საწვავით. ხოლო რაც შეეხება Top fuel დრაგსტერებს, სამივეს ერთიანად აკეთებენ.

Followers

Sunday, August 30, 2015

7 Fake Exhaust Pipes That Make Expensive Cars Look Cheap

In the name of style, manufacturers are sticking all manner of fancily-shaped exhaust tips to hide much smaller, conventional exhaust pipes. And guess what, they look naff!




These days, a huge variety of funky exhaust tip shapes have been appearing on cars. Thin rectangles, ovals, trapezoids…you name it, and it’s been done, particularly at the expensive end of the car scale. The thing is, these weird and wonderful shapes often aren’t practical for mounting onto the end of an exhaust system, so what you’re actually seeing is nothing more than a fake bit of trim stuffed into the bumper, hiding a smaller, conventional circular pipe behind.
Sure, there are reasons other than styling for fitting these - some are designed to shield bumpers from heat and soot - but the fakery is at times so obvious, that the whole setup looks naff and cheap. Here are some of the worst offenders:

1. Audi RS6


Oval pipes are something of an RS tradition, but look closely at any of the modern RS Audis and you’ll see that the ovals are nothing but heat shields hiding four smaller pipes. It’s very obvious, and looks poor.

2. Audi R8


What you’re looking at is a pre-facelift, first-generation V10 R8. These had oval exhaust pipes to differentiate them from the V8 models and their quad setups, but as you can see here, the ‘pipes’ are just trim pieces in the bumper. Post-facelift models all have the same round trims regardless of engines, still with a set of regular pipes quite clearly sitting behind.

3. Lexus IS-F


This one’s pretty upsetting, but we’ll forgive Lexus for the transgression. While the new RC-F features the same diagonally stacked exhaust arrangement, this time the pipes you see sticking out the back are actually connected to the back box.

4. Skoda Octavia vRS


Not an expensive car per-se, but it is the range-topping Octavia, and the naff fake trims bugged me on our old long-term test car to such an extent that I feel I have to mention them. It’s so blatant, you wonder why they bothered. It’s even worse on the diesel model, where only one side actually has a back box hiding behind the trim.
The previous generation Octavia featured a simple, single back-box with two exits, and looked all the better for it.

5. Mercedes C-Class


All C-Classes have ‘floating’ exhaust trim bits, but - as you can see above - they don’t even have any gasses flowing through them on some diesels. Yep, they’re entirely blocked off and are there for nothing but show.

6. Mercedes-AMG GT


Merc’s performance models don’t escape, either, as those neat little trapezoid trims on the back of the AMG GT are quite obviously fake.

7. Ferrari California


Sadly, even Ferrari is guilty of exhaust fakery, as shown by the older, pre-turbocharged California.

                                            Source: Carthrottle

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Falcon F7 – A $225,000 Hand Built Supercar


The F7’s exterior design drew its general inspiration from the 1980s-era supercars, while it rides on a unique tig-welded aluminum chassis with an integrated carbon fibre structural tunnel, as well as carbon fibre reinforced floor pan, firewall and body panels.
The mid-mounted V8 engine and most parts of the suspension are sourced from the Corvette. The naturally aspirated 7.0-litre V8 LS7 is rated at 620 horsepower and 585 lb ft of torque.
Depending on the configuration, Falcon says that the F7 can go from zero to 60 mph in 3.3 to 3.6 seconds, and reach a top speed of 190 to 200 mph.
Production of the F7 Series 1 is limited to ten units.

Koenigsegg "Might" Do a Manual-Transmission Hypercar

But it's probably not very likely.




Christian von Koenigsegg, the mad-scientist founder of the Swedish hypercar company that bears his name, sat down to do another Q&A on his company's blog. Just like the last time, it was chock-full of great tidbits about the company, the philosophy, and the founder himself. 
But most interesting to us was this tidbit, buried at the very bottom of the Q&A. Commenter "Will L" asked, rather bluntly, "will there ever be another manual Koenigsegg?" The founder's answer:
CvK: [Long pause] I don't know. I really enjoy driving our manual cars. We had a great manual gearbox. The clutch was progressive rather than being heavy. The shift was very direct. It's nice and it's a lot of fun. If we get enough demand for it, we might do it.
It's not as efficient. It's not as fast around a racetrack. But it's very engaging and it's fun.
We've said "no" to customers who wanted a manual gearbox in their Agera RS. The biggest headache is that the gearbox would only be six-speed and it would have to be reinforced for the power levels we are at now.​
It's not a firm yes—in fact, it's about as close to a definitive "no" as possible. But there seems to be a crack in the door, one that with the right amount of cash (lots and lots, probably) could perhaps be wrenched open. We yearn for the thought of a three-pedal One:1 hypercar, even if it is a little slower.
Elsewhere in the Q&A, Christian explained why Koenigsegg prefers V8s when so many traditional supercars use V12s:
A V12 makes the engine much heavier and more complex than what we need in terms of performance and function. We still haven't seen the limits of what our V8 engine package can do. Our lightweight V8 engine package is an essential part that makes our cars what they are. We have better power than anyone else, regardless of the number of cylinders. We have better low-end torque. And, I would say, better drivability.
So if you ignore the 'exclusivity' perspective and just look at the goal of being the best, the answer is "No". If we were looking for 2500hp from a combustion engine, then it might make sense​...
And he explained that concerns over weight, size, and handling have prevented an all-wheel-drive Koenigsegg, though perhaps there's a future in a hybrid AWD drivetrain:
Of course, nowadays you can have electric front-wheel-drive, such as in the Porsche 918. That's a different thing. If we were to do this on our cars, it would have to be via hub motors. We have a very compact front-end and we still have to get the roof stowed away in the front. The motors would therefore have to be super-small, super-light (to minimise the extra un-sprung mass) but still effective. I don't think we're there just yet but I know it will happen and when the right hub motors do become available, then we can look at electric four-wheel-drive.​
For more insights into the Swedish hypercar company, including a look at Koenigsegg's patented FreeValve cylinder head design that does away with camshafts entirely, check out the full Q&A on Koenigsegg's website. 
                                                           Source: Road and Track

Thursday, August 27, 2015

The Ford Bronco Might Buckin’ Return!


It’s UAW contract negotiation time in Detroit, and when you get that many people involved, there’s bound to be leaks and rumors. In order for there to be future jobs, there needs to be future vehicles. In addition to the Ford Ranger possibly being slated for a return to production, there’s a possibility that the Bronco is also finally coming back.
Earlier this year, Ford trademarked the name Bronco and that caused a resurgence of rumors relating to the SUV’s return. Now, according to Automotive News, the Bronco might be back on the table as well.
We suspect a modern-day Bronco would look a lot different from the Broncos of old, but with the Jeep line being such a hot segment right now, it’d make a certain amount of good business sense for Ford to try to get a piece of the action. The Wrangler is virtually unchallenged in the automotive landscape, and the upcoming Raptor isn’t really that close of a competitor (except maybe at Mall Crawling).
Automotive News believes it could be based on the recently redesigned Ford Everest, which is surprisingly built on the Ranger platform. If the Ranger is to return, it wouldn’t be too difficult to imagine that the Bronco could follow suit.
                                                                   Source: Ford-Trucks

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Ford plans to build Ranger at Michigan Assembly


Ford Motor Co. wants to resurrect its once-popular Ranger truck in North America and build the midsize pickup at the Michigan Assembly Plant, according to sources with knowledge of Ford’s plans.
The Dearborn automaker has entered contract negotiations with the United Auto Workers with plans to bring the Ranger to the plant in Wayne in 2018, said the sources, who couldn’t speak publicly because of the sensitive nature of the talks. They said the final decision is up for discussion in the talks now underway, and must be agreed to with the union and then Ford’s board of directors.
The Ranger — which would replace the Focus and C-Max after production of those cars likely heads to Mexico — represents the kind of potentially high-profit, high-volume vehicle the union desires and likely would demand before members would ratify any contract proposal. The two sides must agree that the Ranger would be a good fit for the plant and its nearly 4,500 workers. For Ford, the pickup would mark the return to a small — but growing — midsize truck segment that would help it meet stricter fleet-wide fuel economy standards demanded by the federal government.
“There’s a real hunger for midsize trucks right now,” said Karl Brauer, senior analyst for Kelley Blue Book. “Once upon a time, there were a lot of midsize trucks in this market. The ones that are available are cashing in on the demand.”
New offerings like General Motors Co.’s Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon helped midsize truck sales rise recently after a long decline. But through the first seven months of 2015, the segment represented just 2.1 percent of the overall market, according to Edmunds.com.
It’s unclear if the Ranger will be the only product brought into the 5 million-square-foot Wayne plant. Five vehicles currently are built there — the Ford Focus, Focus Electric, Focus ST, C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi — and workers made about 265,000 vehicles last year.
Ford in July said it was pulling production of all its vehicles out of Michigan Assembly in 2018, but both the union and automaker have said repeatedly that they expect to avoid shuttering the plant and hope to introduce a new product there.
“We actively are pursuing future vehicle alternatives to produce at Michigan Assembly and will discuss this issue with UAW leadership as part of the upcoming negotiations,” spokeswoman Kristina Adamski said in an emailed statement. Ford does not comment on future products.
Ford now builds the Ranger in South Africa, Argentina, Thailand and Nigeria for 180 overseas markets. Ford hasn’t imported the small trucks to the U.S. in part because of a 25-percent tariff on foreign-built pickups, known as the “chicken tax.” The tax got its name because it was imposed in the 1960s as payback for a German tariff on chicken.
The last North America-built Ranger was part of a fleet order for Orkin Pest Control and rolled off the assembly line in December 2011 at Ford’s now-shuttered Twin Cities Assembly Plant in Minnesota.
“It was a huge seller for them for a while,” Brauer said.
 Graphic
Revival forecast for segment
The midsize pickup market has shrunk considerably over the past three decades, from a peak of about 1.4 million sold in the U.S. in 1986 to a low of about 227,000 in 2013, according to Edmunds.com. Industry analysts expect the segment will grow to around 300,000 in the coming years.
Through the first seven months of the 2015, Toyota’s Tacoma holds 50.1 percent of the market share, according to Edmunds. It’s followed by the Colorado at 23.1 percent, the Nissan Frontier at 18.5 percent and the Canyon at 8.4 percent.
“The reintroduction of the Colorado and Canyon ended the precipitous market-share slide that the compact truck segment was on,” said Jeremy Acevedo, an Edmunds.com analyst.
Ford sold more than 6.6 million Rangers in the U.S. over its 29-year history. Sales peaked in 1999 at around 350,000 but dropped steadily until its final year in 2011, when Ford sold 70,832.
“It was the same basic truck from the mid-’90s; it was markedly smaller than other midsize trucks, less powerful, less comfortable and less refined,” Brauer said. “It just never evolved. Basically, it became obsolete.”
Ford at the time was coming out of the recession and looking to streamline its product lineup, and it already had committed to a number of new designs for other vehicles for both its Ford and Lincoln brands.
“There were more important vehicles for them to launch that were more important for their money,” said Autotrader.com senior analyst Michelle Krebs.
The biggest concern in resurrecting the Ranger would be that it would cut into sales of the full-size Ford F-150, analysts say. But some argue the two segments are distinct enough to draw two separate shoppers. The F-150 is the best-selling vehicle in the U.S.
“It’s a very different customer,” Brauer said. “There’s a lot of people who like the idea of having an easy-to-drive, easy-to-park truck that’s less expensive.”
Average selling prices for midsize trucks though the first seven months of this year is about $13,500 less than full-size trucks, Edmunds.com says.
The introduction of a more fuel-efficient truck — the Colorado can get about three more miles a gallon than Chevy’s most fuel-efficient full-size Silverado — would also be beneficial to Ford as it and other automakers try to achieve a federally mandated lineup average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.
Although Ford is introducing an updated 2016 Ranger overseas, analysts say a North American Ranger would likely need an upgrade by 2018 to include more safety and technology features.
Plant has built myriad autos
The UAW and Ford in the coming weeks are expected to discuss whether the Michigan Assembly Plant is the best fit for a midsize truck. Since it opened in 1957, the plant has produced everything from trucks and SUVs like the F-Series, Ford Bronco, Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator, to small cars like the Focus and C-Max.
The plant got new life after the industry meltdown in 2008-09. Former Ford CEO Alan Mulally pledged to the UAW to bring new production to Wayne in exchange for a competitive labor agreement.
Under terms of a $5.9 billion loan from the U.S. Energy Department, Michigan Assembly received a $550 million overhaul to make it a flexible plant capable of producing a number of green, fuel-efficient cars.
Despite the overhaul, the plant has struggled recently as demand for small, hybrid and electric vehicles has nosedived.
In January, President Barack Obama came to the plant to tout the resurgent American automotive industry, even as the plant was closed that week. In April, the automaker said it would cut a shift there, indefinitely laying off 673 hourly employees and 27 salaried employees on the “C Crew.”
Potentially converting the plant to build midsize trucks “would really be making a statement about where the market is,” Brauer said.
“I don’t think you’d see someone like Ford jump into midsize trucks and be regretting it in a few short years.”
                                                     Source: Detroit news

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Holden Might Make Its Own Corvette ZR1-Powered Hellcat Fighter

Rumors suggest Holden is working on a ZR1-powered Commodore. What if it comes to America?


​The Holden Commodore isn't long for this world, with production set to end by 2017. That means that we'll also be an end to the Commodore's American counterpart, the Chevy SS, one of our personal favorite muscle sedans.
But a rumor from Australia's ​Drive​ suggests​ suggests that HSV, Holden's internal tuning arm, is working on a Commodore with power from the LS9 V8 that was in the last Corvette ZR1. That means 638 horsepower and 604 lb. ft. of torque.
It does make some sense, since there are some LS9 engines still around and they aren't being used in anything, much like how the Camaro Z/28 was the lucky recipient of the LS7 once the last Z06 went away.
If HSV does build a car, the price would be near $100,000 and production would be very limited. What's the likelihood of such a car coming to America? We won't hold our breath, but, then again, we didn't think the SS would get a manual gearbox or magnetic ride suspension, so there is a chance.
 
                                                         Source: Road and Track

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Why You Still Shouldn't Panic About Car Hacking

Security researchers have figured out how to wirelessly hack into a car and take over its controls from anywhere in the world. But you're probably still safe.



This week, Wired published a fantastic and unsettling report on the current state of automotive hacking. Senior Writer Andy Greenberg ​put himself at the mercy of two digital security researchers as they wirelessly took over control of the Jeep Cherokee he was driving, messing with the car's climate control, stereo, windshield wipers, and eventually stalling the engine. Greenberg was left helpless, coasting nearly to a stop in the right lane of a busy highway as traffic scrambled to avoid him. 

The Wired report is the most credible evidence yet that our increasingly tech-laden vehicles are ripe for hacking, with scanty security measures and an astounding lack of automaker foresight providing avenues for hackers to gain control of a car's functions from anywhere in the world. Whereas previous car hacking stories contained some pretty big caveats—like the fact that evildoers would need todisassemble a car's dashboard and physically plug in a laptop to take over the vehicle's controls—the Jeep that Greenberg was driving was unmodified from how it left the factory. And the researchers who took over its controls were 10 miles away.


That, frankly, is terrifying. Greenberg's article in Wired is nuanced and even-handed, and he carefully and purposefully avoids fearful exaggeration, but the evidence he so thoroughly presents is deeply troubling. It set off a frenzy in the automotive press, and rightly so.
But you probably don't need to panic. And here's why.

The Methodology Is Sound

Greenberg's terrifying hacker roller coaster ride was carried out by Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek, a duo that's been doggedly poking at holes in modern cars' computer systems for years. Miller and Valasek are the team behind most of the "car hacking" news stories of the past few years. In 2013, they took Greenberg (then writing for Forbes) for a thrill ride in a Toyota Prius and a Ford Escape, both wired with laptops in the back seat to take over the driver's controls. Last year, Miller, a security researcher at Twitter, and Valasek, a director at digital security firm IOActive, published a white paper naming what they thought were the most hackable new cars on the U.S. market. Not surprisingly, their number-one hackable car, the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, is the car of choice in this experiment. 
Miller and Valasek's latest and most frightening exploit is completely wireless. Thanks to a vulnerability in Fiat Chrysler's Uconnect dashboard infotainment system, which offers in-car WiFi through Sprint's cellular network, a smartphone connected to Miller's laptop lets him look around the cellular network for Uconnect-equipped vehicles. Using software he and Valasek designed, Miller can see a vulnerable car's vehicle identification number, make, model, and IP address, along with its GPS location, in real-time. Once they've found a target vehicle, Miller and Valasek can worm their way into the entertainment system's firmware, implanting malicious code they designed that can transmit commands to any system connected to the car's network of computers—including the devices that control the car's steering, brakes, and engine and transmission.
Miller and Valasek say that Uconnect systems installed from late 2013 through early 2015 are vulnerable, and while they've only tried their remote-takeover techniques on their own Jeep Cherokee, they estimate that nearly 500,000 vehicles carry the compromised system. FCA issued a statement in response detailing which models of Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram vehicles are affected. 
But while the Wired video that goes alongside Greenberg's Wired piece makes the hacking process look astoundingly simple—just two dudes on a couch, tapping away at their laptops, wreaking havoc on a Jeep on a highway 10 miles away—it was a long and arduous road that led up to that scene. And that's good news for drivers of potentially-vulnerable Uconnect-equipped vehicles. 

The Good Guys

Miller and Valasek's methodology is a marathon, not a sprint. After first finding the one small vulnerability point that allows them to tap into a Uconnect-equipped car's electronics, it took the duo months of arduous coding to develop the code that lets them rewrite the firmware and take over the car's driving controls. And every step of the way, Miller and Valasek have gone about this the ethical way.
The slightly unsettling aspect of all this is that Miller and Valasek plan to publish their findings online, in conjunction with a talk they're giving at the Black Hat digital security conference next month. In fact, that's the best tool to protect us from the dystopian horror of a future of hackable cars. 
Greenberg points out that Miller and Valasek have been sharing their findings with Chrysler for nearly nine months, allowing the automaker to devise a software update that closes the loophole that allowed the hackers entry in the first place. FCA notified affected owners on July 16th, though they did not acknowledge the hacking duo that discovered it. You can see FCA's list of affected vehicles, and download the patch to update your Uconnect-equipped car, right here. By the time the digital security community learns the details of Miller and Valasek's exploit, the fix to prevent it will be widely available, thanks to the hackers' cooperation with FCA.
Secondly, the car-hacking duo is only revealing a small portion of their findings. They won't publish the code that gives them  access to the car's engine and braking controls; neither will they identify the (now-patched) vulnerability that let them in. 
In other words, armed with Miller and Valasek's published findings, a malicious hacker would still need to figure out how to hack into a Uconnect-equipped vehicle, and reverse-engineer the code that allows control of the vehicle, two tasks that took months for these expert-level security hackers. Additionally, Miller and Valasek's method requires them to know the IP address of the car they're trying to hack; as Jason Torchinsky at Jalopnik points out, that drops the likelihood of a hacker targeting one specific vehicle down to near-zero. 
Why publish anything, though? Greenberg explains: 
The two researchers say that even if their code makes it easier for malicious hackers to attack unpatched Jeeps, the release is nonetheless warranted because it allows their work to be proven through peer review. It also sends a message: Automakers need to be held accountable for their vehicles' digital security. "If consumers don't realize this is an issue, they should, and they should start complaining to carmakers," Miller says. "This might be the kind of software bug most likely to kill someone."​

​Help Is On the Way

Simply by virtue of making their findings public, Miller and Valasek helped kick off a fix that will eliminate the vulnerability that made their hack possible. FCA says it has rectified the loophole that allowed the hack in its 2015 models, and released a software update to close the vulnerability in 2013 and 2014 vehicles. When Miller and Valasek publish and discuss their findings at Black Hat, they'll be giving out an incomplete recipe that hinges on a software flaw that has since been patched. And the work of hackers like Miller, Valasek, and others is finally bringing the right kind of attention to the subject: On the same day that Greenberg published his Wired article, Senators Ed Markey and Richard Blumenthal introduced new legislation creating the first-ever automotive cybersecurity standards, which would require greater security measures to prevent malicious code from jumping from infotainment systems to vehicle controls, and establish real-time monitoring to "immediately detect, report, and stop" hacking attempts. 
And as more and more cars get the capability to receive over-the-air software updates, manufacturers will be able to more quickly and efficiently patch vulnerabilities like the one that let Miller and Valasek hack into their Cherokee. That day is coming—Ford and Tesla already have systems capable of automatic over-the-air software updates, and more will soon follow.
So, should you be scared? That's up to you. Is there a hacker out there who knows your Chrysler vehicle's IP address, possesses masters-level computing skills, and has months to devote to reverse-engineering a way to take over your car? If you're not some kind of international spy, the answer is probably "no." 
                                                                     Source: Road and Track

Ford Caspi Concept Envisions the Future of the Wagon


The station wagon used to be an American institution. In fact, for many Americans it was practically a member of the family. But over time, the designs grew weary, the innovation became lackluster, and the wagon gave way to the minivan, the SUV, and eventually, the crossover. 
While that’s a shame, the storied wagon isn’t fully in the ground yet, and this stunning concept penned by Samir Sadikhov proves it still has a place in the world…long into the 21st century.
Meet Sadikhov’s Ford Caspi Concept. He describes the sleek two-door shooting brake as an “Advanced Sport Wagon” and it can be said that there’s nothing quite like it on the road today. At least, there hasn’t been in years.
In his description, Sadikhov notes a key flaw of many designs–a lack of longevity. “Good design always avoids being fashionable, and therefore never appears antiquated.”
As such, his Ford Caspi Concept draws inspiration from timeless, clean-lined furniture, architecture, and automotive design with American and European tastes. Can you spot the Airstream cues? He also looked to powerful character figures in his search for inspiration: Carroll Shelby, Steve McQueen, and Howard Hughes.
That sense of power is immediately obvious from a glimpse of the Caspi’s angular maw, which boasts impactful “FORD” lettering, dead-center. Pumped-up wheel arches find their way to both front and rear of the car, while the wagon’s backend sports a sleek, curved hatch and squared center exhaust.
Inside, the Ford Caspi features an elegant two-seat cabin, with trimmings you’d find on a space-age luxury yacht—or in an Apple Store. This is to say, very good. You could call it, “organic-meets-mechanical.” Wood covers the floor and what appears to be brushed aluminum adorns the seat backs and dashboard. The driver commands the Ford concept car using an aviation-inspired steering wheel and has access to a “floating” center console with a touchscreen inlayed.
While Sadikhov gives no mention to the powertrain he envisions underneath the hood, we wouldn’t mind imagining the 5.0-liter, 435 horsepower V8 from the 2015 Ford Mustang making an appearance.
                                                       Source: Yahoo Autos

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Dodge Hellcat X is an 800-HP Tribute to a WWII Legend


Long before the Hellcat moniker adorned the Dodge Challenger or Charger, it found itself attached to a plane, flying high over the Pacific Ocean. That aircraft was the storied Grumman F6F Hellcat, and it gave United States airmen in World War II a fighting edge against swift Japanese Zero fighters. 
While its fighting ability may be decades old by today’s standards, its legend is still very much alive, and today it forms the inspiration between this hulking muscle car brute–the sinisterly named Challenger Hellcat X.
It’s simply a beast. The Dodge retains its supercharged 6.2-liter Hemi V8 but now complements it with Hellion twin turbochargers to generate a massive 805 horsepower of grunt. And best of all, it’s free. The Hellcat X was created by the 2015 Dream Giveaway sweepstakes and will be awarded to one lucky grand prize winner.
The outrageous power figures don’t end there either. Whereas the standard Dodge Hellcats wallop 650 lb-ft of torque, the Challenger Hellcat X pushes that number to 800 lb-ft. Yikes. Dream Giveaway says it hasn’t tested its acceleration on track yet, but given the massive energy lying under that hood…it’s almost guaranteed to be fast. Its newly applied rear spoiler and sizable front splitter would suggest it is.
But if one muscle car giveaway weren’t enough, the organization will also throw in a 1970 Dodge Challenger R/T, which comes complete with a 440 cu. in. V8 and a pistol grip four-speed manual–all in the name of charity.
                                                                Source: Yahoo Autos

Ford Adds Higher-End Limited Trim to 2016 F-150


When it comes to buying pickup trucks, people vote what they want with their wallets. With the new Ford F-150, people are voting in large numbers for more features and luxuries. For 2016, they are taking the luxury trims one step further by adding the Limited trim. While we don’t have official pricing, it’ll be the most expensive, feature-packed, and luxurious F-150 ever.



So what makes a Limited a Limited? Mainly, standard features. If you take the 2015 F-150 Platinum we recently had in for review, there were still a decent number of options that you could add to the truck. The 2016 Limited will have many of those as standard features.



Additionally, the Limited model will have Ford’s Sync 3 infotainment system and Pro Trailer Backup Assist.



The new truck will have exclusive 22″ polished aluminum wheels, LIMITED raised lettering on the hood, satin chrome door handles, satin chrome badging on the tailgate, and more unique chrome accenting.



Inside, the Limited is separated from lesser F-150s by a laser-engraved VIN and production number on the center console. There’s also genuine fiddleback eucalyptus and aluminum interior accents throughout. Even though we thought the Platinum was a nice place to sit, it appears the Limited is going to take that to the next level.




According to Automotive News, so far this year 60% of F-150s sold have been Lariat, King Ranch, or Platinum trim levels. For those unaware, that’s the luxury trim levels. It makes sense for Ford to cater this and offer even more high-end options.
Pricing isn’t currently available, but Automotive News estimates it’ll start around $60,000 and top out at around $70,000.
                                                              Source: Ford-Trucks