• ფორმულა 1: გრან პრი 2019

    2019 წლის ფორმულა ერთის გრან პრი სარბოლო სესიებით

  • ავტომობილის თვითდიაგნოსტიკის ფუნქცია

    თანამედროვე და, მით უმეტეს, მომავლის „ჭკვიანი ავტომობილის“ ტექნიკური სისტემის მართვა წარმოუდგენელია მისი შემადგენელი მექანიზმებისა და მოწყობილობების მუშაობის მუდმივი (თვით)დიაგნოსტიკის გარეშე. ეს აუცილებელია, რათა მართვის სისტემამ დროულად მოახდინოს რეაგირება სისტემაში მომხდარ არასტანდარტულ მოვლენებზე და ეცადოს, თავად აღმოფხვრას იგი; ან ოპერატიულად გააფრთხილოს მძღოლი უწესივრობების შესახებ; ან (უკიდურეს შემთხვევაში) დაიმახსოვროს ისინი, რათა მოთხოვნისთანავე მიაწოდოს მათ შესახებ ინფორმაცია სერვისის თანამშრომელს (ან მძღოლს).

  • Sir Vival - ექსპერიმენტალური უსაფრთხო ავტომობილი შორეული წარსულიდან

    არსებობენ ავტომობილები, რომლებიც ხანდახან დროს უსწრებენ: ტექნოლოგიით, ვიზუალით თუ ა.შ. უშუალოდ კი ეს ერთგვარი "მუშტაიდის საბავშვო მანქანა" სინამდვილეში 1958 წლის Sir Vival-ია. რომელიც ვოლტერ ჯერომის შთაგონებთი მისია იყო შეექმნა მსოფლიოში ყველაზე დაცული ავტომობილი. პროექტი 10 წელი გაგრძელდა. საბოლოო ჯამში, მას მართალია დასახული მიზანი ბოლომდე ვერ გამოუვიდა მაგრამ მისმა ქმნილებამ მსოფლოში ყველაზე უცნაური ავტომობილის ტიტული მაინც დაიმსახურა. რეალურად, იგი ერთ-ერთი პირველი ავტომობილია 1957 წლის Aurora-სთან ერთად რომელიც ექსპერიმენტალურ უსაფრთხო ავტომობილად შეიქმნა.

  • საავტომობილო შიგაწვის ძრავები

    საავტომობილო ტრანსპორტში დღეისთვის გამოყენებულია ნავთობური წარმოშობის თხევად საწვავზე (ან აირად საწვავზე) მომუშავე შიგაწვის ძრავები. აღნიშნული ენერგეტიკული დანადგარის დანიშნულებაა ნავთობური წარმოშობის საწვავის წვის შედეგად მიღებული ქიმიური ენერგია გარდაქმნას მექანიკურ ენერგიად.

  • რა არის Top fuel და რით განსხვავდება ბენზინისაგან

    თუკი გნებავთ შექმნათ მაღალი სიძლიერის მქონე 4 ტაქტიანი (Stroke) ძრავა, არსებობს რამოდენიმე მეთოდი მის მისაღწევად. პირველი: გავზარდოთ ტაქტი. მეორე: დავაყენოთ ტურბინა/სუპერჩარჯერი. მესამე და ბოლო: შევცვალოთ ბენზინი სხვა უფრო ენერგეტიკული საწვავით. ხოლო რაც შეეხება Top fuel დრაგსტერებს, სამივეს ერთიანად აკეთებენ.

Followers

Saturday, December 13, 2014

TorqShift Swap is Possible with Enough Time and Money

In the forums a question keeps appearing asking about the feasibility of swapping a later model transmission into an older truck. While it is possible, it sure isn’t practical. EVERYTHING is possible given enough time and money.
If you have the time and money I can put ANY engine and transmission in ANY truck. I get to set the price and schedule, though. Oh, yeah, I don’t offer any warranty!
In the old days, before computer controls, if the trans would bolt to the engine it would work. If it wouldn’t bolt to the engine it wasn’t very hard to buy or make an adapter so that it would bolt up. While computers have made vehicles MUCH better (I’ll save the why that’s true for another article) it has made swapping engines and transmissions much, much harder.
Transmissions are now shifted by computer. The 5R110 wouldn’t be possible without computer controls. The shifting is too complicated for hydraulic controls.
The 4R100 is an all non-synchronous design. This means that for each upshift all that happens is a clutch is applied. All you need to do is control the pressure to the oncoming clutch and you’re all set.
The TorqShift is MUCH more complicated. The 1-2 and 5-6 shifts are the same as the 4R100, they are non-synchronous and all you need to do is control the pressure of the OD clutch. The other shifts are the problem.
The 2-3 is a swap shift. This is a special category of difficult shift. I believe Ford was the last trans maker in the world to produce a swap shift transmission. Others have put swap shift transmissions in production and then replaced them within a few years.
To make a swap shift the TorqShift needs to release the OD clutch to downshift the OD gearset while applying the intermediate clutch to upshift the Simpson planetary gearset. This is an upshift and a downshift occurring at the same time in the same trans.
From my experience these two shifts MUST complete within 30 milliseconds of each other or it’s going to feel awful. If the OD releases too soon the engine speed will flare. The amount of flare is dependent on how much sooner it completes. If it completes before the intermediate has enough capacity the trans goes back to first gear! Then it has to make a 1-3 shift.
A few WOT 1-3 shifts means the trans comes out to replace the intermediate clutch. Been there, done that. If the OD releases after the intermediate comes on you end up in 4th gear (1.09:1 ratio) then downshift back to third gear (1.54:1 ratio.) Either way it’s really bad.
Now if you made it through that you need to make a 3-5 shift. 4th gear is the 1.09:1 ratio that is only used in special circumstances. The 3-5 is a synchronous shift. It’s timing requirements are about the same as the swap shift, but there is no downshift. To make the shift the intermediate clutch has to release while the direct clutch applies.
If the intermediate releases too soon you get an engine speed flare. If the intermediate releases too late you get a tie up. A tie up is when all three pieces of the planetary gear set are held from turning. This means the output shaft of the trans STOPS. That’s not a pleasant thing to have happen when you have the go pedal on the floor making a 3-5 shift. You can lock the wheels on an upshift! I’ve done this, too. You can also break expen$ive parts doing a tie up. Been there, done that, too.
Now start thinking of the combination shifts that can happen. How about cruising at 55 mph behind some slow poke on a two lane road? A passing zone opens and you floor it. Now you may want to go from 6th to 3rd gear. You need to release both the overdrive and direct clutches and apply the intermediate. That’s a synchronous shift in reverse.
As you can see from just these few examples it isn’t a trivial task to make one of these transmissions shift. It’s what I did at Ford for quite a few years, three of them working on the TorqShift. I’d be really surprised if anyone makes a controller for the TorqShift that works really well. I think someone could make one that does some basic shifting, but getting one so that it shifts at least as well as a stock trans is going to be a HUGE task.

Horsepower! - 996HP, 311CI Ford


"This is just our mule engine," says Stock Eliminator racer John Calvert. That may be, but this mule looked much more like a thoroughbred when we watched John and noted engine builder and tuner Kenny Duttweiler spin Calvert's supercharged, four-valve motor up on Duttweiler's dyno. Calvert decided to tune the engine on the dyno after a few runs in his updated 2014 Mustang that runs in NHRA's AAA/Stock Eliminator class.
In previous testing, the Mustang has already run 8.80s on a 9.70 index, which is already impressive—remember, this is Stock Eliminator we're talking about. But it's the engine we really came to see. Calvert says that he and engine builder Eric Jones collaborated on assembling the engine that consists of a 0.070-over Coyote 5.0L short-block with a stock crank, Manley rods, and Mahle pistons. For cylinder heads, Calvert is running the Ford Racing CNC-ported four-valve heads along with four "longer duration" hydraulic roller cams from Comp Cams. As you can imagine, he was less than specific about the cams. But the real hero deal is the Ford Racing 2.9L Whipple supercharger and Accufab mono-blade throttle-body.
The main reason Calvert was on Duttweiler's dyno was to get an accurate tune on the engine using one of Holley's brand-new wiring harness packages for the Coyote engine. As of now, there are only about two or three of these in existence to mate Holley's Dominator ECU with the four-cam Ford engine. Holley's Robin Lawrence was also on hand to lend some tuning expertise. The big news was how much power this package put out. We were there long enough to witness multiple pulls from 4,000–9,000 rpm, where the Ford made fantastic power. We saw 1,000 hp flash up on the screen a couple of time during the day, but the run we recorded produced slightly less at 996 hp at 8,400 rpm.
Perhaps even more impressive was the 742 lb-ft of torque peak that occurred a 5,400 rpm, producing an incredibly wide 3,000-rpm powerband. Most normally aspirated engines generally produce a powerband that spans 1,500–1,800 rpm. A well-designed supercharger package might expand that a bit, but clearly the combination of four valves per cylinder and that Whipple blower make for a lethal combination of both peak horsepower and an incredibly wide powerband. Good racers know that while peak horsepower is important to a quick e.t., excellent torque in the midrange also contributes to improving acceleration.

One key to serpentine beltdriven superchargers is to employ more than a 180-degree wrap around the blower pulley. This improves traction and prevents belt slippage that can cost horsepower. The Thump RRR Racing billet belt tensioner probably helped too.
It may only be 311 ci, but when you can squeeze 996 hp out of that, the world will take notice. That computes out to 3.20 hp per cubic inch.
While it's obvious that the Whipple 2.9L blower tends to take center stage cranking out roughly 14 psi of boost, let's not forget the CNC-ported four-valve Ford Racing heads and the contributions from the Comp roller cams. Calvert also says he was using stock Ford coils.
Calvert experimented with two different headers; these are from American Racing and have 17⁄8-inch primaries, of equal length tubing, and a merge collector. He also tried a set of 2-inch primary pipes with a much larger 4-inch collector, but the differences (at least at first glance) in power were negligible.



Thursday, December 11, 2014

Shelby GT350R, new Raptor, Ford GT expected to headline Ford Performance NAIAS announcements

The Ford Mustang Shelby GT350? It appears to merely be the tip of the spear for Ford, which may well have a performance onslaught waiting in the wings, ready to steal the limelight at the 2015 Detroit Auto Show. That's why you got the new "Super Mustang" in LA. Bigger plans are evidently afoot for January. Let's run down what we've heard.

Shelby GT350R

This one's basically a lock. As good as you think the Shelby GT350 sounds, the best is yet to come. The 350R will be the Laguna Seca to the 350's Boss 302. Look for the 350R to, at minimum, get better aero, better brakes, and better rubber. If the Laguna Seca was any indication, expect the back seat to get the boot as well, with additional bracing likely. The Shelby 350R will be the car that Ford puts up as the answer to the Camaro Z/28, regardless of how good the standard GT350 may already be.

F-150 Raptor

Our sources say the next-gen dune-slayer is also Motown-bound, but additional details are scarce. Its appearance would make sense, however, given the larger story at play. Read on.

Ford GT



A replacement for the Ford GT will likely be the big headliner at Detroit. As we've previously reported, several indicators on the racing side suggest Ford is preparing a Le Mans GTE-class car for 2016, the 50th anniversary of the Ford GT40's first Le Mans overall win in 1966. A road-car counterpart would go with that, and Detroit is the logical place to announce everything. If this all comes together as we've heard, it will be the story of the Detroit show, period.

New Halo Brand: Ford Performance

All of the above would fit under a newly-created Ford performance umbrella that would act as the company's M or AMG. Ford has confirmed the name to be Ford Performance, and it will unify SVT, Team RS and Ford Racing under a single global umbrella. .

Focus RS

We all know it's coming, but the matter of where it'll debut is the subject of conflicting reports. We hear it's not going to bow until a European show, likely Geneva, which makes sense since the RS has historically been a Euro-market vehicle (even though we hear a US version is finally in the cards). If all the above goes down in the D, well, Ford needs to save something for Geneva. The guys at Car and Driver, however, hear it's Detroit-bound.

Focus ST and Fiesta ST

The Focus ST would simply be the US debut of the facelifted, revised car that was unveiled at the 2014 Goodwood Festival of Speed. The guys at Car and Driver hear a Fiesta ST update may be announced as well, a topic on which our sources are mum. That's the fun, though, seeing which scuttlebutt comes true.
Long story short, the 2015 Detroit Auto Show is shaping up to be an enthusiast's carnival, and that's just the Ford story. We didn't even touch on the probable debut of the production Acura NSX, the new Camaro, the Cadillac CTS-V, etc. Stay tuned.

The Dodge Charger Hellcat uses unicorn magic, gets 22 mpg


Well, it's official: The 2015 Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat runs on unicorn magic. Chrysler has announced the car's EPA figures, and against all odds, they don't fall somewhere between 0 mpg and 0.1 mpg. The 707-horsepower, supercharged 6.2-liter V8 in the nose of the big sedan somehow managed to eek out 22 mpg highway. The figures in that last sentence have exactly zero business hanging out together, and yet, there they are.
We can thank the Charger's eight-speed automatic gearbox for that. The transmission offers a 7.03 final drive ratio, which means that big, blown V8 is barely breathing on the highway. The slusher also delivers some hilariously quick shifts, right down to 160 milliseconds. Of course, something tells me that if you keep your foot planted in search of the car's 204 mph top speed, your fuel economy may vary.
As if we needed more evidence that we live in the golden age of the automobile.

Watch a drift team build a 1200 hp, twin-turbo, 4-rotor Mazda Miata


From the hood-routed quad waste gate dumps to the eight-injector intake manifold, everything on this NC Miata has been thoroughly massaged and reengineered to accommodate what's essentially a purpose-built R26B—the four-rotor that powered the ludicrous 767 and 787B Le Mans prototypes in the early 1990s. To say this is a custom build is to do an injustice to the word "custom." It's a bespoke-fabbed masterpiece of Mazda excess.
"Mad" Mike Whiddett is a professional drifter from New Zealand who counts Red Bull among his sponsors, and he's calling the MX-5 project the "RADBUL." The team expects the R26B to be capable of up to 1500 hp in short bursts, and from a power-to-weight ratio perspective it should be unparalleled in international pro-spec drifting. There is ongoing coverage of the RADBUL build , but check out the engine build video below:

If you're wondering, the engine work was carried out by Pulse Performance Engineering, the madmen behind the 6-rotor RX-4. You can see the video of that engine on the dyno below:                                                                                        

Corvette Prototypes and Concepts - Trend Setting: Part 4

Covette Prototype

General Motors makes hundreds of kinds of cars and trucks. Some sell hundreds of thousands of units a year, which makes Chevrolet’s Corvette a complete enigma. Given the small number of Corvettes sold every year, it is a modern American manufacturing miracle that the car survived for 61 years.
The Corvette was “officially” born on January 17, 1953 at the GM Motorama Show at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, in New York. To understand the impact of Harley Earl’s two-seater sports car concept car, you have to look at typical cars of 1953. The car was low and sleek, and wasn’t over festooned with styling gimmicks. Based on the response from attendees, Chevrolet rushed the car into production, and the rest is history.
Today, the Corvette is GM’s flagship car. When Chevrolet unleashes a new Corvette, the automotive world stops to take notice. But things were not always this way. Up to the C4, there were many inside GM that wanted to see the Corvette go away. For the first 20-some years, the car suffered from an identity crisis. Inside GM there were always those that wanted the Corvette to be something different; a lightweight sports car, a mid-engine car, a rear-engine car, a four-seater personal luxury car, powered by a boxer-type flat-six, Wankel rotary-powered, turbocharged small-displacement hemi-headed double-overhead cam powered, and even an all-aluminum car. Chevrolet kept the loyal faithful stoked with two or three experimental, prototype, show car Corvettes per year. From an enthusiast’s perspective, this was endlessly fascinating.
This is part four of a chronological look back at Chevrolet’s high-profile experimental, prototype, concept car, and show car Corvettes. Some of the cars had exotic names such as, “Astro-I,” “Astrovette” and “Geneve.” Others had experimental prototype numbers, such as “XP-700” and “XP-882.” And some had sexy names, such as, “Nomad,” “Mulsanne,” “Snake Skinner,” “Mako Shark,“ and “Tiger Shark.” In retrospect, a few of the cars were the shape of things to come, but most were simply, “Here’s an idea of something we’re working on.” Either way, it was all a ton of fun!
1961 Mako Shark I
1963 Pininfarina Rondine

1961 Mako Shark 1
What looked like a prototype Corvette was in actuality another in a long line of teaser show cars. After nine seasons, Corvette lovers were ready for a new machine. The XP-755, called the “Mako Shark,” was truly the shape of the future. What Corvette fans didn’t know was that while the Mako Shark was knocking their socks off, Chevrolet was hard at work sorting out the final design of the ’63 Corvette. This was no small task, as everything except for the engine, transmission, and brakes was completely new. Except for details such as vent placement, grille, and bumper shapes, the second-generation Corvette was nailed down.
Meanwhile, Zora Arkus-Duntov was having a field day making an all-new, advanced chassis for the new Corvette. Outside consultants Jerry Titus, John Fitch, and Karl Ludvigsen were given the opportunity to drive a prototype for their evaluation. Zora and Bill Mitchell had a volcanic argument over the new Sting Ray’s rear “split-window” design. Mitchell was offended that a lowly engineer on a low-volume Chevy line would dare to tell him how to style his pet car. According to Larry Shinoda, the fur really flew! Zora called Mitchell a “red-faced baboon” and Bill called Zora a “White Russian.” Consequently, Mitchell was not invited to drive Duntov’s latest chassis prototype! So, Bill built an exaggerated version of the XP-720 as a show/personal car.
Officially, Mitchell felt that the automotive press was getting too close to the real Sting Ray (the Stingray Racer was a BIG hint), so a radical show car version was needed to “throw off the scent.” While lead stylist Larry Shinoda was in charge of the styling details, when designers asked Mitchell, “How far should we go?” Bill answered, “Keep going it until I say ouch!” Shinoda stretched the nose 12 inches from what would be the real Sting Ray and the headlights were recessed well below the legal height limit. The name and the iridescent blue to white paint design mimicked an actual mako shark that Mitchell caught while on vacation in Bimini.
Since its debut at Elkhart Lake and then the official unveiling at the New York Auto Show in April 1962, the Mako Shark had gone through numerous detail and hardware changes, yet still looked essentially the same. Built on a ’61 Corvette chassis, the XP-755 shape was “close” to the developing ’63 model. The fender humps were exaggerated and surface add-ons decorated the car almost to the point of overkill, but hey, it was supposed to be a show car. The Plexiglas, bubbletop, and prismatic periscope were carryovers from Mitchell’s XP-700 dream car.
Originally, the Mako Shark had a stock ’61 Corvette interior, except for tight bucket seats and a Ferrari steering wheel that was gift from Enzo Ferrari. The engine was a 327 with a small, Roots-type supercharger and four side-draft carburetors. Outrageous four-pipe side-pipes exited from each front fender. Chromed Dayton knock-off wire wheels gave the car that European look. Years later, the interior was redesigned with flat panels and gauges, a 427 engine with an automatic transmission was installed, and alloy lace wheels with wide ties were used.
As per Mitchell’s command that show cars be functional cars, the Mako Shark was a beast—just the way Bill liked them. The Mako Shark looked like a street version of the ’59 Stingray Racer. For a time, the Mako Shark, as well as the Stingray Racer were Mitchell’s daily rides. It was good to be the VP of Design. Corvette fans were more than ready for the real thing, but had to wait 18 months.
1963 Pininfarina Rondine
1963 Rondine
1963 Chevrolet Corvette Rondine
Have you ever noticed the similarity between exotic Italian cars and Corvettes? Many have and there’s a clear reason. Harley Earl and Bill Mitchell were quintessential “designers.” They lived in a world and at a time of beautiful design. Italian design was always about passion and lust. That’s why their cars tended to be curvaceous and sometimes busty.
While attending the 1957 Turin Auto Show, Bill Mitchell was the heir apparent to the throne of GM Design. Working at the side of Harley Earl, Mitchell knew everyone who was anyone in design. Mitchell was very impressed and inspired with Battista “Pinin” Farina’s Abarth 750 Bialbero land speed record car. Mitchell staged an in-house competition among his designers with the Pininfarina speed machine as their inspiration. Designers Peter Brock and Chuck Pohlman’s sketches won the competition. From there Pohlman and Larry Shinoda made a full-size model to make molds from, and the Stingray Racer was born. This was the car that launched the “Shark-look.” So, you could say that Battista “Pinin” Farina is a first cousin of the classic Corvette shark look.
Bill and Battista had an established professional and personal friendship as “car guys” and “designers,” and Pininfarina was in the exotic coach building business, designing and manufactured cars for Ferrari, Alfa Romero, Lancia, and others. When the new ’63 Sting Ray was released, Mitchell thanked his friend by sending him a ’63 Sting Ray roadster with a 327/360hp fuelie and a four-speed transmission. The basic instruction was, “Re-body any way they wish.”
Pininfarina charged American designer Tom Tjaarda with the task of designing an edgy car using the Corvette’s basic structure. While Ferraris were famous for their voluptuous curves, there was a new move in European design that was more linear, with sharp creases; something Mitchell loved because to him, it looked like a freshly pressed suit. Designer Tom Tjaarda later went on to design the Ferrari 330 2+2, the Fiat 124, and the De Tomaso Pantera.
The name “Rondine” is Italian for “swallow” after the design’s “pinched in” rear treatment. Made in steel, the Rondine’s definitive side crease that kicks up at the back of the doors, then slopes down to the back and then forms the “pinched swallow look,” was later used on the Fiat 124 Sport Spider. By extending the sharp horizontal beltline farther towards the front, it gave the look of having the interior farther back. Dual headlights were semi-hidden and mounted behind Plexi covers, with a small top door that opened when the headlights were turned on. The front bumpers were styled very much like the Sting Rays but were longer with a more radical back sweep on the lower part of the bumpers. The center grille section had horizontal ribs with two vertical dividers. The design looked a little like the ’61-’63 Thunderbird—sort of.
As shown originally in 1963, the rear glass stopped just behind the B-pillar, then dropped down, like the ’63 Mercury Monterey. The second and current configuration is a graceful, all-glass, wraparound semi-fastback. This design opened up the otherwise very small rear compartment area and brightened up the stock, white leather-trimmed upholstery. Extra details were added to the lower edges of the door panels and the doorjambs were chrome.
Painted metallic turquoise, the Rondine made its debut at the Paris Salon Auto Show in October 1963. Pininfarina was hoping to generate some custom coach-building business with the Rondine. It didn’t work out. Although the Rondine is a beauty in its own right, it just didn’t set anyone on fire with desire. After making the rounds in the car magazines, the Rondine became a permanent part of the Pininfarina Museum until 2008 when it was sold at the Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale auction for $1.6 million. A private collector in Connecticut now owns the Rondine.
1963 Grand Sport Corvette
 
1963 Chevrolet Grand Sport Corvette
1963 Gran Sport Coupe Illustration
The 1963 Grand Sport is arguably the greatest “could’a been” Corvette. For this series, we’ll look at the Grand Sport from inception to the International Bahamas Speed Week event in Nassau, in December 1963.
Beginning in 1957, Duntov made sure that would-be racers could buy well-engineered parts for their Corvettes. As the new ’63 Corvette worked its way into production, Duntov developed a new option to take advantage of the new suspension and layout. RPO Z06 cost a whopping $1,818, plus $430 for the 327 fuelie engine. This should have been enough, but Duntov wanted more. Four months before the debut of the Cobra, Duntov convinced Chevrolet general manager Semon Knudsen that an ultra-lightweight, factory-produced Corvette was necessary. In June 1962 Knudsen approved Duntov’s plan to build 125 “lightweights”: 25 for Chevrolet and 100 for privateers. Construction began in July 1962 and the first “Grand Sport” was completed in November 1962.
However, trouble was spotted at the Los Angeles Grand Prix in October 1962, when the new Z06 and the Cobra made their debut. Four Z06s were entered, one finished, and won the race, ONLY because the leading Cobra broke an axle hub, allowing Mickey Thompson’s Z06 to take First place. Two months later, Duntov took the first Grand Sport to Sebring for testing and was only seconds off the track record. Things were looking bright until GM chairman Frederick Donner reiterated the official “we do not race” edict, thus killing the Grand Sport. Five Grand Sports had been produced and while Chevrolet wasn’t allowed to race them, three Grand Sports were loaned out to favored racers, but were starved for support. The first win didn’t happen until August 1963 at Watkins Glen for Grand Sport #004 with Dr. Dick Thompson driving. In October, with the season over, Duntov had the three raced Grand Sports returned for “improvements” for the upcoming International Bahamas Speed Week event in Nassau.
 
1969 Chevolet Corvette Front View
The Grand Sports had a steel tube ladder-type chassis and lightweight suspension, but the car looked almost like a stock ’63 Corvette. All-aluminum experimental 377 small-block engines with a special cross-ram fuel-injection system were installed for extra grunt, making the entire engine and drivetrain lightweight aluminum. With 485 horsepower on tap, the Grand Sport needed bigger tires. The original 15x6 Halibrand wheels were replaced with 15x9.5 wheels in the front and 15x11 wheels in the rear, shod with the latest Goodyear Stock Car Special tires. To cover the big tire/wheel setup, a muscular set of fender flares were grafted to the body and a tall, wide domed-hood with two forward-facing scoops helped feed the aluminum engine. Lastly, the fake front fender vents were made functional and across the back, eight vent holds were added between the brake lights to release heat and trapped air. Finally, the Grand Sport looked MEAN.
There were three Nassau races, the December 1, 99-Mile Tourist Trophy Race, the December 6, 112-Mile Governor’s Trophy Race, and the December 8, 252-mile Nassau Trophy Race. During the Tourist Race, overheating differentials forced the two entered Grand Sports to drop out. The solution was to install a small radiator on the rear deck, just behind the rear window. The fix worked and in the 112-Mile Governor’s Trophy Race, the three Grand Sports took First, Second, and Third place in the prototype class! A Cobra came in Eighth. For the December 8 Nassau Trophy Race, the Grand Sports took First and Third in the prototype class with a Cobra coming in Seventh.
The Grand Sports simply out-powered the 289 Cobras. Duntov, Knudsen, and the entire team set their sites on Daytona and Sebring. The two remaining Grand Sports were to be converted into roadsters. Duntov had Le Mans in mind. But everything came to a halt in January 1964 when Donner threatened Knudsen’s yearly bonus. Money talks and the Grand Sport adventure was finished. The cars were loaned out and eventually sold to privateers but had minimal success.

Jaguar's project 7


Wednesday, December 10, 2014

there will be sensor cars near future? o.O


BLOWN 2015 MUSTANG AUTO



Automatic Weapon

Boost Works mates a Kenne Bell 2.8H to an automatic GT and puts down 623 to the wheels



We have seen a lot of impressive performances from power-adder-equipped 2015 Mustangs. However, many of these cars have been heavily modified, manual-transmission-equipped Mustangs. Recently, the crew atBoost Works developed a Kenne Bell supercharger package on a mildly modified Mustang GT with an automatic.

Boost Works developed a new Kenne Bell package on a customer’s automatic-equipped 2015 Mustang GT. This kit is based on the more mainstream KB 2.8-liter supercharger, rather than the large 3.6LC the shop installed on its in-house project.
Boost Works developed a new Kenne Bell package on a customer’s automatic-equipped 2015 Mustang GT. This kit is based on the more mainstream KB 2.8-liter supercharger, rather than the large 3.6LC the shop installed on its in-house project.

For this car, which was initially upgraded with only a set of mufflers and a torque converter, Boost Works developed a kit featuring the Kenne Bell 2.8H Mammoth Twin Screw supercharger.
This is a more mainstream blower for a Mustang GT than the Kenne Bell 3.6LC that Boost Works opted to install on its own shop car.
Here’s an overview of the new package, which the shop has dubbed the 650-S:

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray - Rapid Prototyping

2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Side Quarter View

Standing in at 170 pounds, Steven Fereday isn’t exactly an imposing figure. The dude’s so skinny complete strangers hand him Burger King gift certificates on the street. Maybe that’s part of his cover, because in the racing world looks can be very deceiving. This is a man that built the first LS-powered street machine to run 7s on a stock suspension. Since then, he’s routinely manhandled a 6-second Firehawk and is currently building a twin-turbo, alcohol-injected, big-block Camaro with high-3s in the 1/8-mile as the goal. Oh yeah, Steven and his buddy Josh Ledford also run Late Model Racecraft, a Houston-based speed shop responsible for creating some of the most wicked late-model GM performance cars on the street. And that’s where his latest daily driver—a ’14 Corvette Stingray—comes into play. From day one, it has served as a development mule to help deliver innovative parts to the direct-injected LT1 market. Not surprisingly, within weeks of delivery he transformed it into the most powerful C7 on earth. Can you say 1,292 rear-wheel hp?
If Steven’s slender frame doesn’t throw people off, his youth certainly will. Granted that he’s just a hair past 30 years old, but he’s been building and racing fast cars most of his life. He started street racing at 17, and soon his 9-second ’98 Camaro earned quite a reputation. “I street raced everywhere I could, from Texas to Oklahoma. After a while, the car became so well-known that I couldn’t get any races anymore,” he recalls. “That’s when I started racing in the LS1Tech.com drag series, and won all four of the True Street class events in its first year. After that, the car won three Clash of the Titans events in True Street and True 10.5. That car eventually got a 91mm turbo and ran 7.98 at 175 mph on a stock suspension. While I was still in college, people started asking me to work on their cars for them, so I partnered up with my friend Josh Ledford and started up Late Model Racecraft.”
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Front Grille
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Front Quarter
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Side
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Rear

Between then and now, Steven’s had brief stints with a C6 Corvette and a Viper, but most of his daily drivers have been rather tame. That all changed when he picked up one of the first C7 Corvettes in Houston, complete with the Premiere Edition package. The day the car showed up at the shop, the LMR crew tore it down and got to work. “We want to be the best, and since the Gen V engine platform is so different from the Gen IV, the entire purpose of buying this car was to stay on top of the late-model GM performance industry. We worked with A&A Performance to help develop a supercharger kit using a Vortech YSi head unit,” Steven explains. “We also used this car to develop a custom fuel system, CNC-ported cylinder heads, camshafts, cold-air induction kit, PCV breather system, engine mounts, and coilovers for the C7 platform. Tuning the high-pressure, direct-injection setup on the new GM Gen V small-blocks can be very challenging. It took lots of hard work to figure out, but we were one of the first shops in the country to successfully tune these cars using the stock computer.”
Considering Steven’s background with insanely fast drag cars, merely bolting on a supercharger wasn’t enough. He wanted to max the thing out to, so he enlisted Late Model Engines to build him a short-block that was up to the challenge. Now displacing 416 cubic inches, the LT1 was bored to 4.070 inches, then fitted with a forged Callies 4.000-inch steel crank and rods, and 10.5:1 Diamond pistons. The Vortech-pressurized air molecules travel through LMR CNC-ported LT1 cylinder heads, and a custom LMR hydraulic roller camshaft actuates the valves. Wringing the supercharger out for every last psi it was worth netted a touch over 1,000 horsepower on the chassis dyno, but that still wasn’t enough. A big dose of spray, courtesy of Nitrous Express, and a Snow methanol injection system bumps output to a stunning 1,292 rear-wheel horsepower.
 
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Engine View
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Wheel

It all seems like an exercise in wretched excess in some respects, but there’s good reasoning behind pushing a brand-new Corvette to over 1,500 (flywheel) horsepower. “The compression ratio might seem kind of high on paper, but we learned that direct-injection actually needs a lot of compression. In fact, you can run into detonation issues if the compression ratio is too low,” Steven reports. “The stock engine mounts won’t cut it at this power level, so we developed our own mounts that are now available to the public. We also worked with the Driveshaft Shop to develop a set of C7 axles capable of handling this kind of power.”
A testament to the C7s world-class suspension, the Stingray’s Z51 underpinnings are more than up to the task of planting the power. LMR developed an all-new C7 coilover system for the car, but otherwise the suspension is unchanged. Providing the stick are 20-inch HRE P104 wheels wrapped in Michelin 265/30R20 tires up front and Toyo R888 315/30R20 steamrollers in the back. Although Steven does most of his racing on the track these days, the C7 has smoked a Lamborghini or two in its day. “It’s hard to get traction from a standstill, but the tires hook up very well from a roll. The way the power builds progressively with a centrifugal supercharger really helps put the power down,” says Steven.
Accelerating aftermarket parts development for the latest and greatest GM has to offer is all in a day’s work for Steven and his LMR crew. That’s not too shabby at all for a guy that looks more like a paperboy than a hard-core racer that manhandles 4,000-horsepower drag cars down the track. With the bulk of development work complete on his C7 Stingray, Steven is already planning replacing it with a new Z06 as soon as it hits the street. Maybe then someone (probably Steven) will finally break the horsepower record set by LMR’s stroked, boosted, and nitrous’d C7. All the while, C7 owners of the world will once again rejoice with a stack of new parts available for their new Z06s in no time flat.
 
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Front Seats
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Interior Steering Wheel
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Gauges
2014 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Front Side View

Monday, December 8, 2014

Report: Chrysler adding turbos, direct injection to Pentastar V6



Automotive News reports an upgraded version of the Pentastar V6 is on the way. Word has it that Chrysler plans to unveil a new, turbocharged, direct-injection version of the company's workhorse engine next year. The changes will add power and efficiency to the six-cylinder, helping Chrysler stay within the confines of ever-tightening CAFE regulations.
The report says the turbo mill will show up under the hood of the 2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee first before spreading to other products. It also says the engine will be paired to the company's 9-speed transmission. 
A turbo 3.6 would be a great rival to Ford's EcoBoost six cylinder.We can see
the F-150 vs Ram 1500 throw down from here, and don't even get us started
on the thought of a twin-turbo Challenger. 

Ford is Building a F-150 Hybrid

atlas
After the company’s crushing defeat for the Motor Trend Truck of the Year Award, and the continued defeat in sales against the Ram EcoDiesel. Ford is finally stepping up its pickup game, but we’re not so sure it’s in the right direction.
After the press announcement yesterday from MT about the Truck of the Year, Ford “confirmed” they were working very hard on putting together a hybrid F-150. The Hybrid engine will most likely use a version of the 2.7L EcoBoost V6 engine and will likely return 19 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway.
That’s still a considerable ways off of the EcoDiesel figures, but since the project is still very new, those numbers are likely to change. And if Ford wants to beat the Ram in mpgs, they definitely need to retool it.
According to Raj Nair, Ford’s Global Product Development Chief, even though gas prices are falling, building a hybrid F-150 is the “right thing to do.” This belies Ford actually has a choice to build something better.
Consumers now have a whole range of options when it comes to pickups, and right now, Ford is losing that battle. Ford needs to do something in order to pull back those buyers lured away by Ram and Chevy, and we’re not sure if this is the right way.
FordAtlasConcept_50_HR
Ford’s at a tipping point right now. They can either push forward to where the market is going, or stagnate like GM did in the early 2000s. As of right now, it seems the truck portion of the business is taking the latter path.